8. Error Handling
In this chapter we examine a set of combinators that allow us to construct programs that trap and handle exceptions.
Setting Up
import doobie.imports._
import scalaz._, Scalaz._
import scalaz.concurrent.Task
val xa = DriverManagerTransactor[Task](
"org.postgresql.Driver", "jdbc:postgresql:world", "postgres", ""
)
import xa.yolo._
About Exceptions
Exceptions are a fact of life when interacting with databases, and they are largely nondeterministic; whether an operation will succeed or not depends on unpredictable factors like network health, the current contents of tables, locking state, and so on. So we must decide whether to compute everything in a disjunction like EitherT[ConnectionIO, Throwable, A]
or allow exceptions to propagate until they are caught explicitly. doobie adopts the second strategy: exceptions are allowed to propagate and escape unless handled explicitly (exactly as IO
and Task
work). This means when a doobie action (transformed to some target monad) is executed, exceptions can escape.
There are three main types of exceptions that are likely to arise:
- Various types of
IOException
can happen with any kind of I/O, and these exceptions tend to be unrecoverable. - Database exceptions, typically as a generic
SQLException
with a vendor-specificSQLState
identifying the specific error, are raised for common situations such as key violations. Some vendors (PostgreSQL for instance) publish a table of error codes, and in these cases doobie can provide a matching set of exception-handling combinators. However in most cases the error codes must be passed down as folklore or discovered by experimentation. There exist the XOPEN and SQL:2003 standards, but it seems that no vendor adheres closely to these specifications. Some of these errors are recoverable and others aren’t. - doobie will raise an
InvariantViolation
in response to invalid type mappings, unknown JDBC constants returned by drivers, observedNULL
values, and other violations of invariants that doobie assumes. These exceptions indicate programmer error or driver non-compliance and are generally unrecoverable.
The Catchable
Typeclass and Derived Combinators
All doobie monads have associated instances of the scalaz.Catchable
typeclass, and the provided interpreter requires all target monads to have an instance as well. Catchable
provides two operations:
attempt
convertsM[A]
intoM[Throwable \/ A]
fail
constructs anM[A]
that fails with a providedThrowable
So any doobie program can be lifted into a disjunction simply by adding .attempt
.
scala> val p = 42.point[ConnectionIO]
p: doobie.imports.ConnectionIO[Int] = Return(42)
scala> p.attempt
res2: doobie.imports.ConnectionIO[scalaz.\/[Throwable,Int]] = Suspend(Attempt(Return(42)))
From the .attempt
combinator we derive the following, available as combinators and as syntax:
attemptSome
allows you to catch only specifiedThrowable
s.except
recovers with a new action.exceptSome
same, but only for specifiedThrowable
s.onException
executes an action on failure, discarding its result.ensuring
executes an action in all cases, generalizingfinally
.
From these we can derive combinators that only pay attention to SQLException
:
attemptSql
is likeattempt
but only trapsSQLException
.attemptSomeSql
traps only specifiedSQLException
s.exceptSql
recovers from aSQLException
with a new action.onSqlException
executes an action onSQLException
and discards its result.
And finally we have a set of combinators that focus on SQLState
s.
attemptSqlState
is likeattemptSql
but yieldsM[SQLState \/ A]
.attemptSomeSqlState
traps only specifiedSQLState
s.exceptSqlState
recovers from aSQLState
with a new action.exceptSomeSqlState
recovers from specifiedSQLState
s with a new action.
See the ScalaDoc for more information.
Example: Unique Constraint Violation
Ok let’s set up a person
table again, using a slightly different formulation just for fun. Note that the name
column is marked as being unique.
scala> List(sql"""DROP TABLE IF EXISTS person""",
| sql"""CREATE TABLE person (
| id SERIAL,
| name VARCHAR NOT NULL UNIQUE
| )""").traverse(_.update.quick).void.unsafePerformSync
0 row(s) updated
0 row(s) updated
Alright, let’s define a Person
data type and a way to insert instances.
case class Person(id: Int, name: String)
def insert(s: String): ConnectionIO[Person] = {
sql"insert into person (name) values ($s)"
.update.withUniqueGeneratedKeys("id", "name")
}
The first insert will work.
scala> insert("bob").quick.unsafePerformSync
Person(1,bob)
The second will fail with a unique constraint violation.
scala> try {
| insert("bob").quick.unsafePerformSync
| } catch {
| case e: java.sql.SQLException =>
| println(e.getMessage)
| println(e.getSQLState)
| }
ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "person_name_key"
Detail: Key (name)=(bob) already exists.
23505
So let’s change our method to return a String \/ Person
by using the attemptSomeSql
combinator. This allows us to specify the SQLState
value that we want to trap. In this case the culprit "23505"
(yes, it’s a string) is provided as a constant in the contrib-postgresql
add-on.
import doobie.contrib.postgresql.sqlstate.class23.UNIQUE_VIOLATION
def safeInsert(s: String): ConnectionIO[String \/ Person] =
insert(s).attemptSomeSqlState {
case UNIQUE_VIOLATION => "Oops!"
}
Given this definition we can safely attempt to insert duplicate records and get a helpful error message rather than an exception.
scala> safeInsert("bob").quick.unsafePerformSync
-\/(Oops!)
scala> safeInsert("steve").quick.unsafePerformSync
\/-(Person(4,steve))